Comments on: Sacred 2: Fallen Angel (Xbox 360, PS3)

By: SethvirFireborn

SethvirFireborn — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:36:03 +0000

The game does have its bad points, like the Seraphim seeming to be the glitchiest of the characters, with descriptions and modifying screens not displaying what I actually select to display. The getting stuck problem is maybe running on to a rock, which you can only run off the exact same way, the rock may only be the same width as your characters feet, but you can still only run off the same way. And the freezing, it has only happened to me once on the360 version. Sometimes portalling does bugger up a little, but has rarely happened.

Though the game is as said addictive. I have sometimes though I will only play for another hour at midnight, then next thing its 4am. It is still a decent, albeit a little lacking from the pc version, game. If you like this type of game, try hiring it first. I have found it to be a worth while purchase.

By: MuhChicken

MuhChicken — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:50:59 +0000

LemonJoose, not every game should receive a 6 to 10 rating just because it gets published. I agree 100% with the rating this site gave and believe all of the others are too lenient with giving away their ratings. Had I read this site first I would have forgone this game and saved my cash for something better. I play co-op games with my kid and thought this might be worth a try. Some 80+ hours into it we are both completely frustrated. Mounts disappear and you have to leave the game and come back in for them to show up again. Bugs are every where in this game. Things sell with one set of stats and after you spend the cash and check your inventory you realize you’ve been punked (happened to me twice)! My character constantly gets stuck and I either have to make my mount jump or get off of it and back on to be able to move again. Nothing is more frustrating than when you have one of those stupid escort quests, as mentioned in this review, and your idiot takes off into battle while you get stuck in place and can’t even try to help keep them alive. Honestly I don’t even think this game had a proper beta test! Nothing but poo I tell you, nothing but POOOO!!!!

By: Surrealist

Surrealist — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:08:59 +0000

Really LemonJoose? I think if you really think about it a reviewer describing the CONTENT of a game as “a mire of pure awful” (bloody good phrase that is too, Andi) they don’t think it warrants a score of 6 or 7.

By: LemonJoose

LemonJoose — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:25:26 +0000

4 out of 10? You’re just trolling to get some clicks on your website through Metacritic from angry fans who want to see how you justify giving the lowest review score of all for this game. Even your own write-up cannot justify such a low score. It sounds like you just hate the game for making you want to keep playing it, despite the over-exaggerated flaws in the game you noted. An honest score based on your write-up would have been a 6 or 7 out of 10.

By: Sean

Sean — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:02:07 +0000

Shut up and admit you quite enjoyed Too Human, Andi.

By: Pete

Pete — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:45:00 +0000

See, now this is why I love the reviews on this site. What other review would end with the line “it is STILL poo”?