Comments on: Call of Duty 5 primarily set in Japan

By: Finnie

Finnie — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:37:20 +0000

Call Of Duty 5 is incredible.. Only thing i dont like is that the maps are a bit harder but there is alot more wepens too chose from.

By: steve

steve — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:12:24 +0000

Just played the beta and it plays incredible

By: me

me — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:39:04 +0000

i dont know what you guys are talking about i love the beta the online gameplay is awsome! artillary(instead of airstrike) recon planes (instead of uav) attack dogs i(nstead of chopper) you can still create a class ten classes actualy more grenades and perks

By: Seth

Seth — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:54:05 +0000

That is the longest sentence I have seen in a good while.

I do have to agree that World at War almost feels like a re-skinned COD4 to me. Not that this is necessarily a bad thing.

By: Dumb

Dumb — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:54:00 +0000

the beta is awesome for cod:waw the game engine is the same as cod 4 so the game looks as good if not better and the guns are fine get over it its not Treyarch’s fault you suck at cod the game will be fine its just like cod 4 with diffrent maps just pick up a mp 40 and pretend its a m4 it rolls ppl just as easly so stop crying over the fact its world war 2 and play it or shut up no one wants to hear a bunch of pussy bitch about how much better IW is there awesome cod 4 was amazing but cod 5 will be just as good there going to finsh the war this time and not leave you hanging it will be good

By: you'll are idiots

you'll are idiots — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:29:47 +0000

here is the deal, i have been playing the beta and it plays the same as cod 4 its just ad good. looks just as good, sounds just as good, and as you will all see soon the dogs rule.

By: binnsyowns

binnsyowns — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:21:49 +0000

this post is ryt i played cod1 2 3 and 4 and 4 is the best bad move 3 was shit

By: AngryGuy

AngryGuy — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:50:12 +0000

Wtf i still will buy this game but doubt its gonna be any good. IW is great i hate these japanese comapnies when it comes to fps….. they should just stick to games like metal gear and leave the intense CoD games to the more proffessional people

By: Zack

Zack — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:14:48 +0000

Modern Warfare was great but wrong choice of giong back to the WWII

By: Cameron

Cameron — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:44:19 +0000

If COD5 is gonna be a WWII, Then hurry and finish making it and make COD6 modern

By: Goggs

Goggs — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:08:17 +0000

damnit why do they keep saying its going to be set in Japan

not in japan its going to be set in the pacific god damnit

By: James oNe CL

James oNe CL — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:45:44 +0000

Let’s not be so judgemental.

Yes, it’s pretty much a waste of Treyarch time when they already have “Game of The Year” going for a second year and not to mention they’re making this just under 2 years after CoD4. What’s the point? wasting the companies funds would be one consequence, im sure consumer finances would nowhere be as good as CoD4.

Though, People can change right? so… Ya think Tryearch has changed?

screentshots and soon to be released material does show a high quality game but thats just VISUAL. We want like James Budiano said, maybe a made up WW3 surrounding, transfer this wasted time and effort into a game that would be certainly better than any CoD’s in the series.

It’s 50/50 with me. The trailer or whatever that seems to be doesn’t appeal to me at all, expectations rose after CoD4 came and this seems to have gotten to everyone. If you’ve played CoD4 Campaign then you have saved America from 2 nuclear warheads with an estimated death toll of around 42,000,000, not to mention teams of around 20 taking on hostile forces, again this just racks up, you get to control the gun systems of an AC-130 Gunship.

Just wait and see Ladies and Gentlemen. Treat it as if you have never heard of CoD. But my advice would be Read up and research gameplay etc. before buing or many people will be out of £40/$’s

James.

By: James Budiono

James Budiono — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:26:31 +0000

In ggmania website, it shows that japanese soldier attacking american with Katana blade. well, that’s new. COD6 might be intended to draw more consumer from asia pasific, but who is the main characters here? are we playing as american soldiers again, or we are playing as japanese, chinese, indonesian (my country) character. It was said that setting of the battlefield will be different. Hopefully we will see some interesting mission such as independence of indonesia, raid of singapore, midway war, and of course the atomic bomb in hiroshima and nagasaki.

Personally I prefer modern war, dun have to be historical, they can make up WW3 story, or some Tom Clansy story will be good as well. The point is, I’m disappointed that I’m sick and tired with tommy gun, then I can use mod-ak47, and now I have to use katana blade to fight. The first thing I will do before buying this game is go check the trailers from gametrailers.com or youtube or download the demo

By: Colin Lyons

Colin Lyons — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:17:39 +0000

i dont think going back 2 WW2 is a great idea, as cod4 was such a huge success and a great game
Maybe after this game moving on 2 vietnam or afghanistan would be a good idea, or even modern again

By: robmh

robmh — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:47:17 +0000

how does people not wanting to play another ww2 call of duty mean that they have no respect for real world wars? I would like to see a followup to call of duty 4 modern warfare that is in modern times.

By: McCrone

McCrone — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:42:52 +0000

Why not just leave it how it is, cod4 is the best game out there and they’re going to throw it all away for another wwII game that sucks. Ruined a few months of excitement for me by finding this out!!!!!!!!!

By: Jake (Australia)

Jake (Australia) — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:46:22 +0000

You guys have no respect who died in the REAL Pacific War. You fools are like “Oh, I want Modern”. Dudes, you have CoD4, BF2 and the real thing going on in Iraq/Afghanistan.

I would love to have Australian Army troops in a Call of Duty game in the Pacific.

By: trey

trey — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:34:59 +0000

WWII has been done again and again. We’re all tired of the same guns, the same missions, and the same outcome. Why do you have to base your game on an actual war? Are they that uncreative?
Oh well, that’s just 60 bucks I’ll have to spend on another game.

By: cameron

cameron — Fri, 30 May 2008 16:39:09 +0000

it didnt jump 60 years o_o

but yeah
erm

really bad idea
pacific war would be very bad game

they should just leave call of duty to IW tbh anyone els will just cock it up

By: Dan Newey

Dan Newey — Sun, 11 May 2008 13:05:42 +0000

what a pile of shit. You cant just fucking jump forward 60 years and then back again. A good jump back would be the war in korea or even vietnam. Medal of Honour:Airbourne was wank and im sorry to say that it looks like COD 5 will be too.